ArticleHealth science reports2025
Development and Validation of a Minimum Dataset for a Pediatric Septic Shock Registry: A Descriptive and Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Validation of a Minimum Dataset for a Self-Care Mobile Application for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy: Descriptive-Validation Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A structured approach to designing the minimum data set for telepsychiatry systems.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis in children, characterized by circulatory problems, cellular and metabolic damage, and a high risk of mortality. Managing data through a registry can enhance care and treatment follow-up. This study aimed to develop a minimum data set in line with developing a registry for pediatric septic shock in Iran. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases in 2024. Initially, a literature search was conducted to extract the required data elements from the relevant studies. In the second step, the created minimum data set was validated through the Delphi technique involving ten clinicians. The inclusion criteria for data elements in the registry minimum data set were based on the level of agreement among the experts. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24 software and descriptive statistics. Results: The initial phase of the study involved categorizing 190 data elements into 13 main classes and 27 subclasses. In the following step, after validating these elements using the Delphi technique, 183 data elements were included as the required data items of the minimum data set based on experts' opinion. Conclusion: This study provides a minimum data set for development of a pediatric septic shock registry. Standardizing data collection in this area is essential for comprehensively understanding septic shock in children. This, in turn, will assist policymakers, planners, researchers, and healthcare providers in developing effective care plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.