Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735281›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Using a co-created checklist to improve on-farm biosecurity: an observational pilot intervention with pig farmers and livestock field officers in Sumbawanga, Tanzania.

Aashima Auplish, Kuboja Mjuberi, Henry Magwisha, Damian Tago, Anica Buckel, Ugo Pica Ciamarra, Melissa Mclaws, Martin Heilmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aashima AuplishThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.
Kuboja MjuberiThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Representation in United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Henry MagwishaThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Representation in United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Damian TagoThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.
Anica BuckelThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.
Ugo Pica CiamarraThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.
Melissa MclawsThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.
Martin HeilmannThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Headquarters, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Tanzanian pig sector has the capacity to become market-oriented but it is constrained by significant factors like poor husbandry, management practices and disease, like African swine fever (ASF). Good biosecurity is essential to prevent, minimise or even eliminate biosecurity risks on farms. This study aimed to evaluate a pilot intervention based on an innovative, participatory approach to progressively improve biosecurity practices on small- and medium-scale pig farms in Tanzania. An observational study was conducted, where 30 farms were systematically monitored to assess the impact of using a co-created checklist on biosecurity compliance and production parameters. Livestock field officers (LFOs) were trained to provide technical guidance to farmers to implement the checklist. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with LFOs, which were coded and thematically analysed. The median compliance score for biosecurity was significantly higher after the pilot intervention (20.0 out of 26 practices or 76.9%) compared to baseline (median of 5.50 out of 26 practices 21.2%). The time spent implementing biosecurity per sow (per day) increased from a median of 7.8-18.6 min by the end of the intervention. Pre-weaning mortality decreased from 28.6 to 25.0% and cost of antimicrobial use per sow (per month) was reduced by 57%. Meanwhile, FGDs revealed that the pilot intervention allowed LFOs to connect with farmers to provide services and collaborate with other LFOs to co-develop solutions for farmers. Despite an initial lack of trust, the relationships between LFOs and farmers were described to have positively transformed. These findings highlight the potential of using bottom-up approaches, combined with sensitisation and capacity-building, to address the unique challenges of biosecurity in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

biosecurityco-creationevaluationparticipatory approachpig productionTanzaniaTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID40735281
PMCPMC12303800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.