ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025
Longitudinal Changes of Motor Function in Becker Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Capture the Patient Experience of Becker Muscular Dystrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Effects of sevasemten (EDG-5506) on safety, biomarkers, and functional measures in adults with Becker muscular dystrophy: results of a phase 1b, open-label study.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Innovative therapeutic approach in becker muscular dystrophy. From murine model to focal muscle vibration: a case report assessment through gait analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is due to Methods: We recruited male participants with a molecularly confirmed diagnosis of BMD at our Institution, and followed them up with an observational longitudinal design with functional evaluations, including North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), 6-minute walk test, and timed function tests. Results: We recruited 107 participants. Time-to-event analyses of age at loss of ambulation estimated that only 25% of individuals with BMD lose ambulation by age 60 years. Functional measures, over a follow-up of a mean ± SD of 6.4 ± 3.5 evaluations per participant, and a time of 6.1 ± 3.6 years, showed a poor performance in the common deletions del 45-47 and del 45-48, and preserved muscle function with del 48 and deletions ending on exon 51. In the overall cohort, all measures declined significantly over time, but this decrease was more evident in genetic groups with more marked weakness, and in participants with baseline values of NSAA of 32/34 or lower. Discussion: These data refine genotype-phenotype correlations in BMD; quantify the decline in several practical and reliable motor outcome measures, which can be directly applied to power calculations for clinical trials; and point to useful inclusion/exclusion criteria for trials. Long-term outcomes will serve as a comparator for "real-world" efficacy data of upcoming therapeutics.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.