Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735544›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Recent advances in deep learning for lymphoma segmentation: Clinical applications and challenges.

Wanru Liang, Feiyang Yang, Peihong Teng, Tianyang Zhang, Weizhang Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanru LiangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9710-3250
Feiyang YangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2410-6651
Peihong TengDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tianyang ZhangDepartment of General Surgery Center Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8928-5921
Weizhang ShenDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-0890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphoma is a prevalent malignant tumor within the hematological system, posing significant challenges to clinical practice due to its diverse subtypes, intricate radiological and metabolic manifestations. Lymphoma segmentation studies based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging represent key strategies for addressing these challenges. This article reviews the advancements in lymphoma segmentation research utilizing deep learning methods, offering a comparative analysis with traditional approaches, and conducting an in-depth examination and summary of aspects such as dataset characteristics, backbone networks of models, adjustments to network structures based on research objectives, and model performance. The article also explores the potential and challenges of translating deep learning-based lymphoma segmentation research into clinical scenarios, with a focus on practical clinical applications. The future research priorities in lymphoma segmentation are identified as enhancing the models' clinical generalizability, integrating into clinical workflows, reducing computational demands, and expanding high-quality datasets. These efforts aim to facilitate the broad application of deep learning in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of lymphoma.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical applicationdeep learningLymphomamedical image segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40735544
PMCPMC12304644

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.