Evidence mapPaperPMID 40735704Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Topography-based implants for bone regeneration: Design, biological mechanism, and therapeutics.

Weiwei Guo, Zuge Yang, Fuwei Liu, Jianye Song, Wenhao Yang, Yunpeng Li, Wenhui Hu, Kun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weiwei GuoDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, PR China.
Zuge YangDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, PR China.
Fuwei LiuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shanxi, 710032, PR China.
Jianye SongDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, PR China.
Wenhao YangDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, PR China.
Yunpeng LiState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shanxi, 710032, PR China.
Wenhui HuDepartment of Basic Medicine, Frontier Medical Service Training Brigade, Third Military Medical University, Changji, Xinjiang, 831200, PR China.
Kun WangDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing demand for bone defect repair, bone implant materials have emerged as a critical alternative to traditional autologous or allogeneic bone grafts. However, their clinical performance remains limited due to challenges such as prolonged healing times and suboptimal repair quality. Moreover, in patients with certain pathological conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis), disruptions in the bone microenvironment further compromise regenerative outcomes. To address these limitations, surface modification strategies have been developed to regulate implant-bone tissue interactions and improve therapeutic efficacy. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in bone regeneration implants with a focus on topographical modifications, encompassing design principles, underlying biological mechanisms, and therapeutic applications. Particular attention is given to the influence of implant surface topography on the biological behaviors of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and macrophages within the bone microenvironment, as well as their responses under complex pathological and physiological conditions. The review also discusses current challenges related to achieving micro/nanoscale structural balance, personalization, and clinical translation of implant surface topographies, and highlights future directions in precision bone regeneration through multidisciplinary approaches, artificial intelligence-driven optimization, and long-term clinical validation. Collectively, these insights may inform future research on bone implant materials and support the development of novel strategies for personalized treatment of bone defect repair.

Indexed as

Biological mechanismsBone regenerationImplantsSurface morphologyTranslational applications

Identifiers

PMID40735704
PMCPMC12305250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.