ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Magnetic resonance imaging morphological features of the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve in Fabry disease.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the trigeminal nerve in Fabry disease (FD) by comparing the morphology of the trigeminal nerve in patients with and without FD.
methodsThis retrospective study included 40 patients with FD and 40 age- and sex-matched controls who underwent 3T MRI with constructive interference in steady-state sequence. Two neuroradiologists measured the short-axis length on axial and oblique coronal images and the long-axis length and cross-sectional area on oblique coronal images of the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve bilaterally. Morphological differences were assessed between groups and between sides within each group using appropriate t-tests.
resultsAll measurements were significantly smaller in the FD group than in the control group: axial images: short-axis length (3.20 ± 0.52 mm vs. 3.51 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.0101); oblique coronal images: short-axis length (2.41 ± 0.28 mm vs. 2.61 ± 0.35 mm, p = 0.007); long-axis length (3.75 ± 0.53 mm vs. 4.14 ± 0.44 mm, p < 0.001); and cross-sectional area (7.71 ± 1.68 mm² vs. 8.93 ± 1.30 mm², p < 0.001). Left-right differences were observed in both groups; the left side was generally larger. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed moderate diagnostic performance (area under the curve, 0.66-0.72).
conclusionThe trigeminal nerves in the cisternal region were significantly smaller in patients with FD than in those without FD. These findings may support its potential utility as an imaging biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736598What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.