Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Comparison of Procedural Oxygen Mask Versus Conventional Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06681558 (Comparison of Procedural Oxygen Mask vs. Conventional Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Procedural Oxygen Mask vs. Conventional Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare the effects of a conventional nasal cannula (NC) and a Procedural Oxygen Mask™ (POM™) on oxygenation and airway interventions during sedated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the semi-prone position.
methodsIn this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 150 patients undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive oxygen via either an NC or a POM™. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia and secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe and prolonged desaturation, the duration of hypoxemia, the number of hypoxemic episodes per patient, and the lowest recorded SpO
resultsHypoxemia occurred in 14 patients (18.7%) in the NC group and in 4 patients (5.3%) in the POM™ group, with a significant difference between groups (p = 0.024). The lowest recorded SpO
conclusionsThe use of a POM™ during ERCP while the patient is in the semi-prone position under sedation significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia and may therefore contribute to improved oxygenation management. This finding suggests that a POM™ is a viable alternative to NC.
trial registrationThe clinical trial was registered at https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ (NCT06681558) on October 31, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736944What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.