ArticlePediatric neurology2025
Survey of Child Neurologists Highlights a Missed Opportunity for Identifying and Treating Motor Impairments in Autism.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMotor impairments, such as motor delays, atypical gait, dyspraxia, and poor coordination, are highly prevalent among individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Motor impairments are detrimental to multiple aspects of development but are often underdiagnosed and undertreated in children and adolescents with ASD. Child neurologists are specialists who provide clinical care for autistic patients across the lifespan. However, little is known about how child neurologists understand, diagnose, and treat motor impairments in children with ASD.
methodsIn this preliminary study, we surveyed child neurologists (N = 100) on their knowledge of and clinical practices addressing motor impairments in pediatric patients with ASD. Our survey also sought to identify potential barriers to care and medical education efforts that may mitigate existing gaps.
resultsWe found most child neurologists were not confident that motor impairments were an associated feature of ASD, do not frequently evaluate for motor impairments, lack sufficient tools for motor evaluations with autistic children, face multiple barriers to providing interventions, and do not receive adequate clinical training regarding this topic.
conclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that substantial gaps in awareness about motor impairments in ASD persist among practicing child neurologists. Though child neurologists are trained to assess motor function, our results highlight a missed opportunity in the setting of ASD. Child neurologists would benefit from greater attention and resources to learn, evaluate, and treat motor impairments as part of holistic patient care for individuals with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.