ArticleAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2025
Prognostic factors and nutritional support in menopausal women with chronic heart failure.
Article in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMenopausal women with chronic heart failure (CHF) exhibit unique physiolog-ical characteristics and prognostic features. The aim of this study is to analyze the significant predictive factors for the prognosis of chronic heart failure in menopausal women and the impact of different nutritional interventions on prognosis. METHODS AND STUDY
designA total of 270 menopausal women with CHF were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups based on the nutritional intervention received. Analyze the significant predictive factors of all-cause mortality, readmission rate, deterioration of cardiac function, deterioration of nutritional status, and deterioration of quality of life, as well as the impact of nutritional interven-tion on these prognoses. Build a risk score model based on significant factors in the prognostic model. Evaluate the predictive ability of the model through the ROC curve.
resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NYHA grading BNP, eGFR, The level of estradiol (E2) and nutritional intervention are signif-icant influencing factors in multiple prognostic indicators, among which the enhanced nutritional support and micronutrient supplementation program in nutritional intervention have a significant protective effect on poor prognosis. The constructed nutritional risk model has good discriminative ability and robustness in predicting prognosis.
conclusionsThis study identified menopausal characteristics, NYHA classification, BNP, eGFR, and estradiol levels as important prognostic predictors in menopausal women with CHF. Enhanced nutritional support and micronutrient supplementation significantly improved patient prognosis. The risk model based on nutritional intervention provides scientific basis for the management strategy of chronic heart failure in menopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.