Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738969›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Efficacy of topical heparin spray on donor site wound healing after split thickness skin grafting.

Faraz Adil, Mahak Ali Memon, Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan, Asadullah Awan, Saad Uddin Siddiqui, Farhan Zahid Piprani, Kulsoom Zareen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04613336 (Efficacy of Topical Heparin Spray on Donor Site Wound Healing Time Compared to Conventional Dressing Among Patients Undergoing Split Thickness Skin Grafting), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04613336 unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Topical Heparin Spray on Donor Site Wound Healing Time Compared to Conventional Dressing Among Patients Undergoing Split Thickness Skin Grafting

TypeobservationalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsWound Healing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Faraz AdilDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, A 61, Block 13/D, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. faraz333pk@yahoo.com.
Mahak Ali MemonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, A 61, Block 13/D, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Faisal Akhlaq Ali KhanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, A 61, Block 13/D, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Asadullah AwanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Saad Uddin SiddiquiDow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Farhan Zahid PipraniDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, A 61, Block 13/D, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Kulsoom ZareenDepartment of Nursing, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All wounds that cannot be closed primarily needs skin coverage earliest to prevent form infections. Skin graft provides earliest and easiest wound coverage, but produces another wound, i.e. donor site wound. This study was conducted to see healing time efficacy in donor site wounds. Study was designed as prospective and randomized control study, in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Civil Hospital Karachi, included 60 patients who underwent split thickness skin grafting. From the next day of surgery heparin and conventional dressings groups were made and dressing was done daily till seventh postoperative day. Data in form of questionnaire and photographs were recorded. This study was a self-controlled trial, therefore every trial participant served as his/her own control. The results of the analysis showed a decrease in soakage of dressing and a reduction in itching at intervention site. In regard to wound size, 40% of participants showed a reduction in wound size and only 20% showed no improvement at interventional half. During 7days, 81.67% of participants showed improvement in edema at intervention half. The study showed heparin irrigation resulted in better wound healing by reducing pain, edema, faster healing and reducing soakage of dressings.Trial registration The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Dow University of Health Sciences and was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (ID NCT04613336) on 13/07/2021.

Indexed as

HeparinSkin TransplantationTransplant Donor SiteWound HealingAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedBandagesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHeparinDonor site woundDressingsHeparinWounds

Identifiers

PMID40738969
PMCPMC12311127

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.