SynthesisNeurocritical care2025
Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative Neurocritical Care After Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Letter to the Editor: "INTERACT3 in Intensive Blood Pressure Meta-analysis: A Methodological Reappraisal".Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Response to "When Precision Meets Bias: Questioning the Validity of Pooled Estimates in Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Meta-analyses".Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Association between hematoma expansion and short-term neurological outcomes in patients with spontaneous basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage at different blood pressure levels after blood pressure control: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is often associated with elevated blood pressure (BP), increasing the risk of persistent and recurrent hemorrhage, disability, and death. Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding BP management, particularly concerning treatment timing and optimal targets. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intensive BP lowering with standard management in patients with ICH.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensive BP lowering (target < 140 mm Hg) with standard management in patients with ICH. Outcomes included good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score 0-2), poor functional outcome (mRS score 3-6), all-cause mortality, and substantial hematoma enlargement. Subgroup analyses assessed (1) BP target thresholds, (2) randomization window (< 6 h vs. ≥ 6 h from symptom onset), and (3) BP target type (systolic blood pressure based vs. mean arterial pressure based). All analyses were conducted based on risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.
resultsEleven RCTs (13,625 patients; 6,755 in the intensive group) were included. Intensive BP lowering was associated with a significant reduction in poor functional outcome (mRS score 3-6; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96; p < 0.01) and an increase in good functional outcome (mRS score 0-2; RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18; p = 0.03). All-cause mortality (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; p < 0.01) and substantial hematoma enlargement (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95; p < 0.01) were also significantly lower in the intensive group. The subgroup analyses revealed no significant interactions.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that intensive BP lowering in ICH might be associated with improved functional outcomes and lower risks of death, disability, and hematoma enlargement, supporting its potential role in acute management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40739079What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.