Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739170›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Candidate imprinting control regions in dog genome.

Phillip Wyss, Minou Bina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phillip WyssDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Minou BinaDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. Bina@Purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, genomic imprinting restricts the expression of a subset of genes from one of the two parental alleles. The process is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) dispersed across autosomal chromosomal DNA. An unresolved question is how to discover candidate ICRs across the entire canine genome. Previously, bioinformatics analyses found a significant fraction of well-known ICRs in mouse, human, and Bos taurus. Analyses were based on finding the genomic positions of clusters of several CpG-rich motifs known as ZFBS-morph overlaps. These motifs are composite DNA elements. For this report, we performed similar studies to pinpoint candidate ICRs in the dog genome. A key feature of the bioinformatics approach is creating density plots to mark cluster positions as peaks. In genome-wide analyses, peaks in plots effectively discovered candidate ICRs along chromosomal DNA sequences of the Canis familiaris breed Boxer. With respect to Non-Dog RefSeq Genes, several candidate ICRs are in regions analogous to ICR positions in mouse DNA, in human DNA, or both. In the Boxer genome, examples include candidate ICRs for parent-of-origin-specific expression of the MEST isoform PEG1, INPP5F_V2, the PLAGL1 isoform ZAC1, IGF2R, PEG3, and GNAS loci. In mouse, imprinted genes in these loci play important roles in developmental and physiological processes.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomic ImprintingAnimalsComputational BiologyDogsGenomicsHumansMiceAllele-specificCanineCanis familiarisCpGDMRDog genomeGene regulationGenome-wideICRImprinted genes

Identifiers

PMID40739170
PMCPMC12309131

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.