ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Optimizing treatment for depression in primary care using psychotherapy versus antidepressant medication in a low-resource setting: protocol for the OptimizeD randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05944926 (Improving Outcomes in Depression in Primary Care in a Low Resource Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Outcomes in Depression in Primary Care in a Low Resource Setting
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a baseline battery to optimize depression treatment assignment in primary care: Balancing breadth and brevity.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychotherapy and antidepressant medications are first-line treatments for depression, and they both have significant treatment effects on average. However, treatment response varies widely across patients, and neither approach is universally effective. Identifying the most effective treatment for each patient is critical everywhere, but particularly in low-resource settings where access to mental health care is limited. The Optimizing Depression (OptimizeD) trial aims to explore whether different patients respond differently to behavioral activation therapy versus antidepressant medication and if providing each patient with their optimal treatment improves outcomes in primary care.
methodsWe plan to randomize 1,500 patients with moderate to severe depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] score ≥ 10) from primary healthcare settings in Bhopal, India, with equal allocation either to a culturally adapted behavioral activation therapy delivered by trained counselors (Healthy Activity Program) or to antidepressant medication (fluoxetine). Treatment will last 3 months, with remission (defined as PHQ-9 score < 5) at 3 months as the primary endpoint. Using machine learning, we will attempt to develop a precision treatment rule that leverages baseline clinical, psychological, cognitive, socioeconomic, and biological data to predict which treatment is most likely to achieve remission for each patient. Cost-effectiveness analysis will then assess whether the added costs of optimizing treatment are justified by improvements in remission, recovery, and cost savings at the health system and societal levels. Secondary and exploratory objectives include assessing the effectiveness of optimization in a range of secondary outcomes, evaluating treatment mechanisms, and exploring whether incorporating genetic and biological markers as predictors improves treatment optimization. DISCUSSION: The OptimizeD trial will evaluate whether baseline information collected in routine care can inform optimal depression treatment selection and identify predictors of nonresponse to facilitate timely specialist referrals. Findings have the potential to enhance personalized depression care in primary health systems, particularly in low-resource settings, with broader implications for global public health.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05944926; registered July 2, 2023) and Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2024/01/061932; registered January 29, 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.