ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Acute care of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: practical consensus statement from a multidisciplinary group of German-speaking neurointensivists and neuroradiologists on behalf of the DIVI neurology section.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and clinical therapies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Impact of early enteral nutrition combined with bedside rehabilitation on functional outcomes and length of stay in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a critical condition requiring multidisciplinary management, particularly in the intensive care setting. Despite existing guidelines, gaps in evidence and variability in practice remain, necessitating practical, consensus-driven recommendations for acute care and management.
objectiveTo develop comprehensive, practical consensus statement for the acute management of aSAH, addressing high- and low-evidence areas, through a modified Delphi consensus approach among German-speaking neurointensivists and neuroradiologists.
methodsSenior experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, and interventional neuroradiology were selected for their academic and clinical expertise. The consensus process included iterative rounds of Delphi surveys, a face-to-face meeting, and online discussions. Consensus statements were formulated based on literature review, expert input, and iterative validation, with a consensus threshold of ≥ 70% agreement.
resultsThe group reached consensus on key aspects of aSAH management, including diagnostic protocols, invasive monitoring, blood pressure and temperature control, prophylactic and therapeutic measures for vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia, nutrition, and mobilization. Specific guidance was provided for early surgical/endovascular intervention, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, enteral nutrition initiation, and fever prevention. The consensus emphasized evidence-informed strategies where available and expert-derived recommendations in areas lacking robust data, such as therapeutic hypothermia and multimodal monitoring.
conclusionThis practical consensus statement provides a standardized approach to aSAH management, balancing guideline-based evidence with expert consensus to address clinical uncertainties. Due to the used methods and composition of the group, the results should be considered as a multi-institutional protocol of an experienced neurointensivist group, but certainly not as evidence based-guidelines. Adoption of this consensus may improve outcomes and harmonize care in the intensive management of aSAH.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.