Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739698›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Individual variation in animal communication: from species averages to unique voices.

Angèle Lombrey, Marlen Fröhlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angèle LombreyPaleoanthropology Section, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, Tübingen, 72070, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-2816-7925
Marlen FröhlichPaleoanthropology Section, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, Tübingen, 72070, Germany.

Funding

Volkswagen Foundation 9B138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparative study of communicative behaviour in non-human animals, especially primates, has yielded crucial insights into the evolution of human language. This research, mostly focused on the species and population level, has improved our understanding of the various socio-ecological factors that shape communication systems. However, despite the inherent flexibility of human communication, the impact of individual variation on non-human communication systems has often been overlooked, along with its potential to shed light on the roots of human language. While the eco-evolutionary relevance of genetic and phenotypic differences between individuals is well established, animal communication studies have traditionally focused on group averages and treated outliers as noise. In this review, we address this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the sources of individual variation in animal communicative behaviour (e.g. physiological, sociodemographic, or personality traits), across parameters such as signal forms, repertoires, and usage strategies. In particular, recent evidence from comparative work underscores the potential evolutionary significance of individual plasticity in communicative behaviour. We argue for an explicit focus on within-individual variation and propose advancing the study of animal communication through multi-level approaches that integrate intrinsic and environmental factors, as well as between- and within-individual variation. Such approaches not only refine our view of complexity in animal communication systems and their implications for social evolution, but also help trace the evolutionary trajectory of human language through comparative studies.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansSpecies Specificitybehavioural reaction normcommunicative plasticitycross‐species approachindividual signatureslanguage evolutionpersonalitysociodemographic factors

Identifiers

PMID40739698
PMCPMC12586282

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.