Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739868›Full record

ReviewCNS spectrums2025

Do antipsychotics work in people with schizophrenia? A review of outcomes and effect sizes.

Christoph U Correll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS spectrums, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/05vh9vp33Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-5646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe origins and treatment-target-related mechanisms of schizophrenia remain to be fully understood. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments require expansion and improvements to meet peoples' needs and goals. Nevertheless, antipsychotics are a cornerstone when managing schizophrenia, being essential for reducing symptom severity, preventing relapse, improving long-term functional outcomes, and reducing premature mortality risk.

methodsThis narrative review synthesizes key evidence on the efficacy and risks associated with antipsychotic medications. The concept of effect sizes is introduced, allowing to compare antipsychotics across trials with different rating instruments and across different conditions.

resultsThe available evidence in schizophrenia and comparison with medications used for medical conditions counters the sometimes-voiced criticism that antipsychotics "do not work." Instead, for a substantial group of people with schizophrenia, positive psychotic symptoms and global psychopathology improve witha small-medium effect size of about 0.4 versus placebo. These results are comparable to median effect sizes across commonly used medications for somatic disorders. When patients with initial response are continued on antipsychotics, the effect size increases to 0.9 for relapse prevention, translating into a number needed to treat (NNT) of about 3 to prevent one more relapse versus no treatment. This NNT is 10-20 times higher than that for the prevention of poor outcomes in some common medical conditions.

conclusionsDespite general efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotics for schizophrenia, further development is needed regarding preventive interventions and medications with mechanisms other than postsynaptic dopamine receptor blockade, with broader efficacy for positive, negative, cognitive, suicidality, and/or reward dysregulation symptomatology, and the identification of illness mechanism/biomarker-targeting treatments to enhance treatment personalization.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaHumansTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychoticseffectivenesseffect sizesefficacypatient-centered careschizophreniatolerability

Identifiers

PMID40739868
PMCPMC13064719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.