Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739982›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2025

Exploring Technology Supporting Aging-in-Place Using an Equity Lens Through Focus Groups and World Café-Informed Research Agenda: Qualitative Study.

Marianne Saragosa, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Evan MacEachern, Michelle LA Nelson, Kristina M Kokorelias, Sidra Bharmal, Brina Ludwig Prout, Marian Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marianne Saragosa *Science of Care Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada, 1 416-461-8252 ext 2895.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-5971
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde *Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Centre, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-0541
Evan MacEachernLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-3374
Michelle LA Nelson *Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-0298
Kristina M KokoreliasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-472X
Sidra Bharmal *Science of Care Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada, 1 416-461-8252 ext 2895.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-0073
Brina Ludwig Prout *Hennick Bridgepoint Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marian Mohamed *Science of Care Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada, 1 416-461-8252 ext 2895.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1497-3100

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults prefer to age in their home or community of choice, which could include naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs). As a place with a high density of older adults, NORCs could be sites where technology is leveraged to support independence and aging in the right place. However, there is limited research on how technology adoption and use occur in NORCs in ways that support older adults. Objective: This study aims to cocreate a research agenda on equity-informed technology considerations that help older adults live independently in NORCs. Methods: This is a 2-phase sequential qualitative descriptive study of 5 community-based focus groups and an in-person World Café event. We use the focus group method to acquire data about older adults' experiences with and perceptions of using technology to support aging-in-place in NORC settings. This data informs the design and facilitation of deliberate dialogues at the World Café event. Three questions helped to guide the small group discussions. The World Café is a creative, collaborative, and conversation-generating method that aims to generate exchanges between people with different views on a particular topic. Results: In total, 45 NORC residents participated in a focus group about their experience and use of technology. The data revealed 3 central categories that highlight the perception of the use of technology to support the independence of participants in their homes and communities, its challenges, and areas to consider when deploying technology for helping older adults age in place. The subsequent World Café event included 40 participants and a combination of NORC residents, service providers, researchers, technology innovators, and policy makers. Insights drawn from the focus groups and World Café informed a 10-question research agenda about equity-informed technology principles that span accessible support, accessible interfaces, affordable and equitable access, available digital literacy training, accessible data, and accessible partnerships. Conclusions: Our study explores NORCs as potential environments for offering a transformative opportunity to address equity considerations for technology supporting aging in place. Our findings and research agenda highlight critical areas for consideration, including leveraging partnerships, integrating public and private technology ecosystems, and designing technology with older users that evolves with the population's needs. Notably, by embedding principles of equity, inclusivity, and user-centered design, the collective of developers, researchers, and service providers can ensure that emerging technology serves diverse aging populations equitably and effectively.

Indexed as

AgingIndependent LivingTechnologyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative Researchaging in placecommunityequityolder adultresearch agendatechnologyworld cafe

Identifiers

PMID40739982
PMCPMC12311316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.