ReviewJournal of diabetes2025
The Potential of SARMs and Antimyostatin Agents in Addressing Lean Body Mass Loss From GLP-1 Agonists: A Literature Review.
Review in Journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endocrinological aspects of sarcopenic obesity.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular and cellular mechanisms of muscle-adipose tissue crosstalk driving sarcopenic obesity: an integrative review of human, animal, and in vitro models.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 18th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2024/2025.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
- Management of Obese Patients with Cardiovascular Disease with Emerging Weight-Lowering Drugs: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Association between the nutritional risk index and postmenopausal osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Preserving the Metabolic Engine: Muscle as the Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Prevention in Obesity Pharmacotherapy.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- The Potential of SARMs and Antimyostatin Agents in Addressing Lean Body Mass Loss From GLP-1 Agonists: A Literature Review.Journal of diabetes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects among patients with diabetes and obesity. However, given the rapid weight loss induced, there is concern about the total change in body composition, including lean body mass (LBM). Current literature on these effects contains significant heterogeneity, with some studies reporting a loss of 40%-60% of LBM and others reporting 15% or less. To combat this, selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) have become a popular candidate. Given their androgen receptor selectivity, SARMs have notable anabolic properties and proposed improved safety profiles over traditional anabolic compounds. Several of these agents, such as enobosarm, have been investigated in clinical trials involving older patient populations or patients with cachexia or sarcopenia secondary to chronic diseases. Furthermore, other agents to maintain or enhance LBM, such as antimyostatin agents, are also under investigation. Exploring this potential synergy could lead to better weight loss and body composition management in patients using GLP-1 RAs for diabetes or weight loss therapy. This review aims to evaluate the potential benefits and uses of SARMs in ameliorating the body composition changes induced by GLP-1 RAs. Other investigational agents to retain or increase muscle mass and the future possibilities of these drugs will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.