ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
2025 THRS Expert Consensus of Imaging Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Recovery of Cryoballoon Ablation-Induced Phrenic Nerve Palsy: A Case Report.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Vein Ostial Thrombosis after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Leading to Stroke: Clinical Insights from a Rare Case.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- The Indispensable Role of Imaging in Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmia in the elderly population with a high lifetime risk after the age of 45 years, leading to a major impact on the public health from elicited left atrial (LA) thrombogenesis and cardioembolic stroke. Imaging in the AF population plays a crucial role, not only in assessing LA size but also in delineating the underlying cardiac structural and functional features to reach a more specific diagnosis. Contemporary clinical practice guideline recommended anticoagulation therapy based on annual thromboembolic event risk using a validated clinical risk score. However, patients who remain uncertain about the anticoagulation may benefit from considering other risk variables or markers, such as bedside atrial imaging, to help inform the clinical decision. In this regard, imaging in the diagnosis, potential etiology and thromboembolic risks of AF can facilitate decisions about anticoagulation therapy among patients at an intermediate annual risk. Additionally, the implementation of advanced imaging for catheter-based interventions, such as catheter ablation, further provides pivotal anatomical and pathophysiological insights during procedures and assists in monitoring after therapeutic delivery. Our current consensus offers an overview highlighting the evolution, strengths, and advances of these imaging techniques and tools, whether using invasive or non-invasive modalities, and their potential to supplement precision medicine in the context of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.