Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740575›Full record

ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025

Ultrasound and

Elham Zarei, Sepideh Hekmat, Jilla Armandeh, Mahmoud Khodadost, Ahmad Ramezani Farkhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham ZareiDepartment of Radiology, Ali Asghar Children Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepideh HekmatDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jilla ArmandehDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahmoud KhodadostDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Ramezani FarkhaniDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-058X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is crucial to prevent potential complications such as recurrent urinary tract infections and kidney damage. Noninvasive diagnostic alternatives to voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), such as ultrasound (US) and 99mTc-DMSA scan, offer effective and safe methods for identifying VUR without exposing children to ionizing radiation. This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy of US and 99mTc-DMSA scan in detecting VUR compared with VCUG among children with urinary tract infection (UTI). Methods: In this observational study, we included 540 hospitalized children with UTI in Aliasghar Children`s Hospital between April 2017 and May 2019. US and VCUG were performed on all patients, with 99mTc-DMSA administered to some to detect VUR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, overall accuracy, and kappa agreement were calculated to evaluate ultrasound efficacy in predicting VUR based on VCUG-confirmed existence or nonexistence of VUR. Results: Out of 540 patients, VCUG identified VUR in 143 cases, with 90 (63%) classified as grades III to V. US results were abnormal in 97 of the 143 patients (67.8%) confirmed to have VUR via VCUG, while the 99mTc-DMSA scan showed abnormalities in 41 out of 69 (59%) cases detected by VCUG. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the 99mTc-DMSA scan for diagnosing VUR were recorded at 59.42% and 46.59%, respectively. For ultrasound, the overall accuracy was 61.30%, with sensitivity at 67.83%, specificity at 58.94%, NPV at 37.31%, and positive predictive value (PPV) at 83.57%. In children with high-grade VUR (grades III-V) as determined by VCUG, the sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for ultrasound were found to be 80%, 58.2%, and 93.60%, respectively. However, when both US and 99mTc-DMSA scan results were utilized for detecting high-grade VUR, the sensitivity, specificity, and NPV were calculated to be 92%, 42.30%, and 93.20%, respectively. Conclusion: While both US and the 99mTcDMSA scan are not fully reliable in detecting all grades of VUR individually, integration of US and ^99mTc-DMSA scan demonstrates reliable sensitivity and NPV for effectively excluding high-grade VUR. These findings suggest that in children with normal results from both US and ^99mTc-DMSA scans, there may be no need for VCUG. This approach could significantly reduce unnecessary VCUG procedures, minimizing patient exposure to radiation and enhancing overall diagnostic efficiency in pediatric care.

Indexed as

Technetium-99m-Dimercaptosuccinic acidUltrasound Urinary tract infectionVesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID40740575
PMCPMC12309340

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.