Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740631›Full record

ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of Hindi Version of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome-quality of Life Scale (PCOSQOL-I) - A Cross-sectional study.

Reeta Mahey, Sujata Satapathy, Partha Haldar, Supriya Kumari, Monica Gupta, Aarthi K Jayraj, Archana Kumari, Rohitha Cheluvaraju, Rekha Ramappa, Ayushi Negi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reeta MaheyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Sujata SatapathyDepartment of Psychiatry, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Partha HaldarDepartment of Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Supriya KumariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Monica GuptaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manipal AMRI Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Aarthi K JayrajDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Archana KumariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Rohitha CheluvarajuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Motherhood Hospital, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Rekha RamappaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Ayushi NegiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With specific symptomatology and clinical presentation, the validity of standard quality of life assessment scales is questionable for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women. Aim: The aim of the study was to translate and validate the Hindi version of the PCOS-related Quality of Life (PCOSQOL) scale into culturally adaptable, screening tool for Indian women with PCOS. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: After standard translation and linguistic validation, modifications were done as per culturally acceptable items. After the item content validity index and scale content validity ratio testing, the preliminary tool was prepared. After pilot testing and minor modifications, the final PCOSQOL for Indian Women (PCOSQOL-I) tool was applied to 287 PCOS women to check reliability, exploratory factor analysis, uniqueness, and factor loading. Statistical Analysis Used: R (version 4.3.0 [2023-04-21]). Results: The CVI of the 27-item Hindi tool was 0.73, 0.83, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively, for relevance, clarity, appropriateness, and necessity, thus indicating recommended content validity. A three-factor solution emerged through exploratory factor analysis with proportional variance for factors 1 (impact of PCOS), 2 (hirsutism), and 3 (infertility) as 0.22, 0.12, and 0.10, respectively. The cumulative variance was 0.22, 0.35, and 0.44, respectively. There was high internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha 0.89). On factor loadings, and dropping items with value <0.3, final 25-item PCOSQOL-I scale was developed where each item scored 0-4 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Conclusion: The PCOSQOL-I scale has good reliability and may be used to screen the quality of life for PCOS women. Further testing of the tool is warranted to check its competency to differentiate among PCOS women with different phenotypes.

Indexed as

Infertilitymental healthpolycystic ovary syndromePolycystic Ovary Syndrome-related Quality of Lifepsychological healthquality of life

Identifiers

PMID40740631
PMCPMC12306719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.