ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Comparative analysis of the nutritional quality of plant-based and traditional meat products across European markets.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Work stress, dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome among military personnel in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-based meat substitutes on the German market: a characterization based on declared nutrient contents, Nutri-Score, organic and vegan labeling, and use of iodized salt.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Plant-Based Burgers Commercialized in the Spanish Market: Ingredients and Nutritional Assessment Based on Their Labels.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing global demand for plant-based meat (PBM) alternatives highlights the need for comprehensive assessments of their nutritional quality in comparison to traditional meat products. Methods: This study evaluates the nutritional profiles of PBM and meat products from major supermarket chains in Romania, Germany, and Ireland. The analysis focused on key nutritional parameters, including energy value, macronutrient composition, and fiber content. Results: PBM products exhibited a lower energy density, reduced saturated fat content, and significantly higher fiber levels than their meat counterparts. However, protein content remained lower in PBM products, while salt levels varied by category. Notably, products from Romania displayed inferior nutritional profiles compared to those from Germany and Ireland, with higher energy, fat, and salt content but lower fiber levels. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for policy-driven improvements in PBM formulations and standardized nutritional guidelines across markets. The study contributes to the growing body of research on sustainable dietary transitions and their implications for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.