ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Machine learning and SHAP value interpretation for predicting cardiovascular disease risk in patients with diabetes using dietary antioxidants.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-Trimester Zinc Supplementation Reduces Preeclampsia Incidence in Chronic Hypertensive Pregnancies: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.Biological trace element research · 2026Observational
- Evaluation and analysis of clinical outcome prediction for trauma patients based on machine learning.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- Machine learning combined with population pharmacokinetics: a hybrid model for predicting the plasma concentration of linezolid in critically ill pediatric patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- HPLC-HRMS and interpretable machine learning decipher serum lipidomic signatures in NSCLC.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Dietary intakes of cysteine, glutamate, proline, and tryptophan are associated with hypertension risk in Chinese children and adolescents: a national cross-sectional study integrating machine learning.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning model that integrates dietary antioxidants to predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in diabetic patients. By analyzing the contributions of key antioxidants using SHAP values, the study offers evidence-based insights and dietary recommendations to improve cardiovascular health in diabetic individuals. Methods: This study leveraged data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to develop predictive models incorporating antioxidant-related variables-including vitamins, minerals, and polyphenols-alongside demographic, lifestyle, and health status factors. Data preprocessing involved collinearity removal, standardization, and class imbalance correction. Multiple machine learning models were developed and evaluated using the mlr3 framework, with benchmark testing performed to compare predictive performance. Feature importance in the best-performing model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: This study utilized data from 1,356 individuals with diabetes from NHANES, including 332 with comorbid CVD. After removing collinear variables, 27 dietary antioxidant features and 13 baseline covariates were retained. Among all models, XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an accuracy of 87.4%, an error rate of 12.6%, and both AUC and PRC values of 0.949. SHAP analysis highlighted Daidzein, magnesium (Mg), epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), pelargonidin, vitamin A, and theaflavin 3'-gallate as the most influential predictors. Conclusion: XGBoost exhibited the highest predictive performance for cardiovascular disease risk in diabetic patients. SHAP analysis underscored the prominent contribution of dietary antioxidants, with Daidzein and Mg emerging as the most influential predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.