Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740718›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

The domestication of the wolf larynx-testing the neural crest connection.

Jacob Hansen, Nicole D S Grunstra, W Tecumseh Fitch, Andrew C Kitchener, Michaela Gumpenberger, Raffaela Lesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob HansenDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Nicole D S GrunstraDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-2245
W Tecumseh FitchDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-0928
Andrew C KitchenerDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-0827
Michaela GumpenbergerClinic of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Raffaela LeschDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-252X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural crest domestication syndrome (NCDS) hypothesis suggests that selection pressures for tameness during animal domestication resulted in a down-regulation of neural crest cell migration and proliferation, providing a mechanistic explanation for traits commonly observed across domesticates. We test the viability of this hypothesis via a derived prediction. According to the NCDS hypothesis, neural crest-derived structures should be reduced throughout the entire organism in domesticated variants compared to their wild ancestors. Here, we test this prediction by comparing the larynges of wolves and domestic dogs. Anatomical landmarking of the cricoid and thyroid cartilages confirmed absolutely and relatively shorter vocal folds and smaller larynges in normal (mesocephalic) dogs compared to wolves. Additional quantification of laryngeal anatomy shows that mesocephalic dogs have a smaller cricoid diameter and shape-altered thyroid shields. In addition, we quantify the concrete anatomical changes to the laryngeal cartilages caused by brachycephaly, finding that a flattened thyroid shield and ventral cricoid ring fit the symptomatic descriptions of laryngeal collapse. Our comparison of the larynges of wolves and dogs are consistent with the NCDS-derived prediction and support the validity of the NCDS hypothesis.

Indexed as

domesticationlarynxNCDSneural crestwolf

Identifiers

PMID40740718
PMCPMC12308335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.