ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2025
Unstructured Electronic Health Records of Dysphagic Patients Analyzed by Large Language Models.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for early identification of radiotherapy related toxicities from the electronic health records of patients with head and neck cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- [A Transformer-based multimodal model for predicting hospital-acquired infections using imaging and clinical laboratory data].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Multimodal LLM-driven IoT digital healthcare platform for intelligent dysphagia dietary monitoring.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDysphagia is a common and complex disorder that complicates both diagnoses and treatment. Consequently, the associated electronic health records (EHR) are often unstructured and complex, posing challenges for systematic data analysis. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In this study, we employ natural language processing (NLP) techniques and large language models (LLMs) to automatically analyze clinical narratives and extract diagnostic information from a diverse set of EHRs. Our dataset includes medical records from 486 patients, representing a group with diverse dysphagic conditions. We analyze diagnoses provided in unstructured free text that do not follow a standardized structure. We utilize clustering algorithms on the extracted diagnostic features to identify distinct groups of patients who share similar pathophysiological swallowing dysfunctions.
resultsWe found that basic NLP techniques often provide limited insights due to the high variability of the data. In contrast, LLMs help to bridge the gap in understanding the nuanced medical information about dysphagia and related conditions. Although applying these advanced LLM models is not straightforward, our results demonstrate that leveraging closed-source models can effectively cluster different categories of dysphagia.
conclusionOur study provides therefore evidence that LLMs are highly promising in future dysphagia research. CLINICAL IMPACT: Dysphagia is a symptom associated with various diseases, though its underlying relationships remain unclear. This study demonstrates how analyzing large volumes of electronic health records can help clarify the causes of dysphagia and identify contributing factors. By applying natural language processing, we aim to enhance both understanding and treatment, supporting clinical staff in improving individualized care by identifying relevant patient cohorts. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement: This study uses LLMs to efficiently preprocess unstructured EHRs, improving dysphagia diagnosis and patient clustering. It aligns with Clinical Research, enhancing diagnostic speed and enabling personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.