ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Coercive compliance? Anti-doping systems in tennis and athlete mental health.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, a group of professional tennis players (i.e., the Professional Tennis Players Association) filed a legal case against several governing bodies in the sport. This suit intends to challenge the alleged disregard for athlete wellbeing when enforcing anti-doping policy, as this can engender adverse effects even in unintentional or unproven cases. This complaint is set against the background of several high-profile doping proceedings in tennis, which have further revealed potential inconsistencies in integrity investigations and processes. Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to explore the possibly harmful conditions for athletes described in this litigation, as well as to acknowledge the need for multi-faceted support among professional players. In doing so, this perspective paper also draws attention to the need for fairness in professional sport, alongside proposing ways in which sport psychiatrists and sports medicine physicians can advise and advocate for education for players, other healthcare specialists, and governing bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.