ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Multi-omics perspectives for gastrointestinal malignancy: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoids: From Bench to Bedside Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Transforming Gastric Biopsy Diagnostics: Integrating Omics Technologies and Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in gastrointestinal cancer: immunomodulatory mechanisms via the tryptophan-AhR axis and translational perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms and Biomarkers Driving the Transition From Chronic Atrophic Gastritis to Gastric Cancer.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Review
- From gut to mouth: salivary signatures of carcinogenic microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal Cancer: Outcomes and Therapeutic Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, including gastric and colorectal cancers, remain one of the primary contributors to cancer-related illness and death globally. Despite the availability of conventional diagnostic tools, early detection and personalized treatment remain significant clinical challenges. Integrated multi-omics methods encompassing genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and microbiome profiles have emerged as powerful tools for advancing precision oncology, improving diagnostic accuracy, and informing therapeutic strategies.
aimTo investigate the application of multi-omics approaches in the early detection, risk stratification, treatment optimization, and biomarker discovery of GI malignancies.
methodsThe systematic review process was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Science, were searched for studies published in English from 2015 onwards. Eligible studies involved human subjects and focused on multi-omics integration in GI cancers, including biomarker identification, tumor microenvironment analysis, tumor heterogeneity, organoid modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analytics. Data extraction included study characteristics, omics modalities, clinical applications, and evaluation of study quality conducted with the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 instrument.
resultsA total of 17196 initially identified articles, 20 met the inclusion criteria. The findings highlight the superiority of multi-omics platforms over traditional biomarkers (
conclusionMulti-omics approaches offer significant advancements in the early diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and personalized treatment of GI malignancies. Their integration with AI analytics, organoid biobanking, and microbiota modulation provides a pathway for precision oncology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.