ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and validation of machine learning-based diagnostic models using blood transcriptomics for early childhood diabetes prediction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling an ALS Blood Transcriptomic Signature: A Machine Learning Classifier Distinct from Neurodegenerative Controls.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in biofilm research: computational approaches for biofilm analysis and antimicrobial prediction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) in pediatric populations is crucial for implementing timely interventions and improving long-term outcomes. Peripheral blood transcriptomic analysis provides a minimally invasive approach for identifying predictive biomarkers prior to clinical manifestation. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning algorithms utilizing transcriptomic signatures to predict T1DM onset in children up to 46 months before clinical diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed 247 peripheral blood RNA-sequencing samples from pre-diabetic children and age-matched healthy controls. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using established bioinformatics pipelines to identify significantly dysregulated transcripts. Five feature selection methods (Lasso, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting Machine) were employed to optimize gene sets. Nine machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine) were combined with selected features, generating 45 unique model combinations. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. Model validation was conducted using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in an independent cohort of six children (three healthy, three diabetic). Results: Transcriptomic analysis revealed significant differential expression patterns between pre-diabetic and control groups. Four model combinations demonstrated superior predictive performance: Lasso+K-Nearest Neighbors, Elastic Net + K-Nearest Neighbors, Elastic Net + Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine+K-Nearest Neighbors. These models achieved high accuracy in predicting diabetes onset up to 46 months before clinical diagnosis. Both Elastic Net-based models achieved perfect classification performance in the validation cohort, demonstrating their potential as clinically viable diagnostic tools. Conclusion: This study establishes the feasibility of integrating peripheral blood transcriptomic profiling with machine learning for early pediatric T1DM prediction. The identified transcriptomic signatures and validated predictive models provide a foundation for developing clinically translatable, non-invasive diagnostic tools. These findings support the implementation of precision medicine approaches for childhood diabetes prevention and warrant validation in larger, multi-center cohorts to assess generalizability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.