Evidence mapPaperPMID 40741019Full record

ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2025

Novel cardiac biomarkers and multiple-marker approach in the early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of cardiac diseases.

Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari, Muhammad Umais, Syed Muhammad Faizan Sattar, Umair Mehboob, Asma Iqbal, Maaz Amir, Danyal Bakht, Khawar Ali, Abdul Haseeb Hasan, Muhammad Arsham Javed and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Syed Faqeer Hussain BokhariDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad UmaisDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad Faizan SattarDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Umair MehboobDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Asma IqbalDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Maaz AmirDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Danyal BakhtDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Khawar AliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abdul Haseeb HasanDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arsham JavedDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Wahidullah DostDepartment of Curative Medicine, Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul 10001, Afghanistan. wahidullahdost96@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating innovative diagnostic and prognostic strategies. Traditional biomarkers like C-reactive protein, uric acid, troponin, and natriuretic peptides play crucial roles in CVD management, yet they are often limited by sensitivity and specificity constraints. This narrative review critically examines the emerging landscape of cardiac biomarkers and advocates for a multiple-marker approach to enhance early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of CVD. In recent years, several novel biomarkers have shown promise in revolutionizing CVD diagnostics. Gamma-glutamyltransferase, microRNAs, endothelial microparticles, placental growth factor, trimethylamine N-oxide, retinol-binding protein 4, copeptin, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, galectin-3, growth differentiation factor-15, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, fibroblast growth factor 23, and adrenomedullin have emerged as significant indicators of CV health. These biomarkers provide insights into various pathophysiological processes, such as oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, metabolic disturbances, and myocardial injury. The integration of these novel biomarkers with traditional ones offers a more comprehensive understanding of CVD mechanisms. This multiple-marker approach can improve diagnostic accuracy, allowing for better risk stratification and more personalized treatment strategies. This review underscores the need for continued research to validate the clinical utility of these biomarkers and their potential incorporation into routine clinical practice. By leveraging the strengths of both traditional and novel biomarkers, precise therapeutic plans can be developed, thereby improving the management and prognosis of patients with CVDs. The ongoing exploration and validation of these biomarkers are crucial for advancing CV care and addressing the limitations of current diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Cardiac biomarkersCardiovascular disease diagnosisMultiple-marker approachPrognostic indicatorsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40741019
PMCPMC12304849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.