ReviewCardiac failure review2025
Heart Failure Management in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Towards a Paradigm Shift.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the scope of SGLT inhibitors in underrepresented cardiac populations: from pathophysiology to clinical evidence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- SGLT2 inhibitors in cardiac amyloidosis: mechanistic insights and clinical perspectives-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are significant clinical challenges, with evolving epidemiological patterns reshaping the understanding of these conditions. Traditionally linked with HF with preserved ejection fraction, CA is increasingly recognised for its specific characteristics, including a considerable subset of patients presenting with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This review explores how the neurohormonal activation observed in CA impacts on disease progression and management strategies. Historically, neurohormonal antagonists were considered contraindicated in CA owing to concerns about autonomic dysfunction and chronotropic incompetence. However, recent evidence suggests a paradigm shift, indicating that such agents may offer therapeutic benefits even in these patients. By examining these developments, this review provides a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic approaches, the role of neurohormonal modulation and the need for personalised care strategies to address the complexities of HF in the context of CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.