Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742990›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2025

Opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer among the general population.

Kirstie McLoughlin, Melissa A Merritt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kirstie McLoughlinThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melissa A Merritt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOvarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Early detection and treatment options are limited, so prevention is key. This article reviews the current opinion on opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention within the general population. RECENT

findingsSalpingectomy (the removal of the fimbriated ends of the fallopian tubes) reduces ovarian cancer risk without inducing early menopause or depleting ovarian reserves. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics firmly supports the use of salpingectomy opportunistically (in addition to planned abdominal surgery) for ovarian cancer risk reduction. When salpingectomy should be provided as an elective surgery, and what nongynecological surgeries can be used as opportunities for salpingectomy, is an ongoing discussion. SUMMARY: As understanding of the safety and efficacy of opportunistic salpingectomy has solidified into guidelines, its use for ovarian cancer risk reduction has increased. However, the uptake of opportunistic salpingectomy has varied between geographic regions and across institutions. In the US, roughly a third of women undergo a hysterectomy during their lifetime, each of these women should have a chance to consider opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Education about the benefits and harms of opportunistic salpingectomy is both necessary and effective in reducing inequities in access to this risk-reducing surgery.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsProphylactic Surgical ProceduresSalpingectomyFemaleHumansHysterectomyguidelinesovarian cancerpreventionrisk-reducing surgerysalpingectomy

Identifiers

PMID40742990
PMCPMC12506689

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.