Observational studyPloS one2025
A multi-biomarker approach to risk stratification and detection of early cardiac disease in systemic sclerosis.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Dysregulation and Molecular Signaling in Systemic Sclerosis Cardiac Disease: An Integrative Echocardiographic, Microvascular, and Biomarker Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to investigate the relationship between serum biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction, longitudinal strain on echocardiography, and all-cause mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis.
methodsThis was an observational study using a biorepository of serum samples of patients with systemic sclerosis who underwent echocardiography. We investigated 3 biomarkers: periostin, galectin-3, and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide and applied a K-means clustering resulting in 3 patient clusters. We subsequently measured left ventricular and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain in each cluster. We then determined the association between each cluster and time to all-cause mortality compared to N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide, alone.
resultsThe 125 patients with systemic sclerosis included in the study were divided into 3 clusters based on biomarker levels (Cluster 1: N = 75; Cluster 2: N = 39; Cluster 3: N = 11). Compared to Cluster 1, Cluster 2 had only elevated periostin levels whereas Cluster 3 had elevated levels of all 3 serum biomarkers and was characterized by reduced left ventricular and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain, regionally and globally. When adjusted for age, sex, systemic sclerosis disease duration, and forced vital capacity, patients in Cluster 3 had a HR of 14.42 (95% CI: 4.82, 43.18) for all-cause mortality compared to those in Cluster 1.
conclusionIn conclusion, combining N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide, periostin, and galectin-3 as serum biomarkers enhances risk stratification and sensitivity in detection of cardiac disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. However, before implementation in routine care, further prospective studies must refine biomarker sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy together with optimizing detection strategies and establishing clinical protocols for integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.