Evidence mapPaperPMID 40743516Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review.

Stefan Walzer, Christoph Armbruster, Sonja Mahler, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Christophe Kunze

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan WalzerCare & Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-5244
Christoph ArmbrusterSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Faculty and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-0780
Sonja MahlerCare & Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9789-2793
Erik Farin-GlattackerSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Faculty and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-0316
Christophe KunzeCare & Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-5533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital nursing technologies (DNTs) are a promising solution to address challenges in health care systems, such as demographic shifts, nursing shortages, or difficulties in retaining nurses. Despite their potential benefits, the integration of DNTs into care settings remains complex due to multiple factors influencing their implementation and adoption.

objectiveWe aimed to examine factors that influence the implementation and adoption of DNTs used in nursing care settings from the perspective of nurses.

methodsWe used an umbrella review methodology to synthesize the evidence on DNTs and the complexities of their implementation. We searched for systematic reviews that focused on DNTs in formal care settings across 4 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Business Source Premier) and examined reference lists of the included reviews published in English until January 2025. Two researchers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data analysis was structured by embedding the results in the NASSS (nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework, a model for explaining the adoption and abandonment of health and care technologies, as well as challenges to their scaling, diffusion, and sustainability. Reporting of this study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist.

resultsA total of 4803 reviews were identified, of which 65 (1.36%) met the inclusion criteria. We identified 52 influencing factors across 6 NASSS domains, with particular emphasis on adopter-related barriers and facilitators. Key barriers included insufficient training, increased workload, and low technological confidence, which impacted efficiency and the quality of care. In addition, concerns regarding professional role, autonomy, and privacy influenced nurses' acceptance of DNTs. Facilitators included leadership support, a positive corporate culture, and targeted training initiatives.

conclusionsWe synthesized key facilitators and barriers to implementation and adoption of DNTs in nursing care. Leadership support, adequate training, and alignment with care needs drive successful implementation, while resource constraints and workflow disruptions pose challenges. Addressing both technological requirements and nursing needs is critical. Future research should focus on long-term studies and practical tools to support stakeholders in effectively integrating DNTs into nursing practice.

trial registrationOSF Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/BG8CY; https://osf.io/bg8cy.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyHumansSystematic Reviews as Topicadoptioncaredigitalimplementationnursingtechnologyumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40743516
PMCPMC12355146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.