ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
eHealth Literacy and Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Patients With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between mHealth Literacy and Hypertension-Related KAP Among Older Adults with Hypertension: Chain-Mediating Roles of Health Empowerment and Patient Activation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-led, digitally enabled transitional care after acute myocardial infarction: design and baseline characteristics of the AMI-HOPE nationwide stepped-wedge trial.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Digital health readiness among rural hypertensive patients: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ability to participate in digital health services such as remote blood pressure monitoring needs digital skills and knowledge known as eHealth literacy (e-HL). However, e-HL is rarely studied among those participating in remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM). Objective: This study assessed e-HL levels among participants with hypertension and determined the e-HL domains that predict participation in RBPM. This study provides important focus areas to increase RBPM participation. Methods: This study was a quantitative, cross-sectional survey of people with hypertension in the United States. The survey included demographics, RBPM participation questions, and the e-HL questionnaire (eHLQ) for assessment of e-HL. The eHLQ is a 35-item, 7-domain validated questionnaire including the (1) ability to process information, (2) engagement in own health, (3) ability to actively engage with digital services, (4) feel safe and in control, (5) motivated to engage with digital services, (6) access to digital services that work, and (7) digital services that suit individual needs. The eHLQ item scores range from 1 to 4, and the higher the score, the higher the e-HL status. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants' demographics and e-HL status. χ2 tests were used to compare participants' characteristics between RBPM and nonRBPM groups. The Mann-Whitney U test compared the e-HL domain scores in RBPM and nonRBPM groups. Firth logistic regression was used to predict participation in RBPM. The dependent variable was participation in RBPM. The independent variables were demographics and e-HL domains. Results: A total of 507 people with hypertension participated in the survey. Sixty participants were currently participating in RBPM, giving a prevalence of 11.8% (60/507). The mean age of RBPM participants was 46.2 (SD 14.7) years and nonRBPM was 62 (SD 13.7) years (P<.001). The e-HL scores in all 7 domains were significantly higher for the RBPM group than the nonRBPM group. Among the e-HL domains, higher scores in digital services that suit individual needs (domain 7) were the only predictor of RBPM participation (adjusted odds ratio 2.84, 95% CI 1.002-8.84) adjusted for age, sex, and race. Conclusions: Digital services that are tailored to individual patients' needs are more likely to result in participation in RBPM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.