Evidence mapPaperPMID 40744273Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2026

Immunometabolism of macrophages in the bone microenvironment: a new perspective for bone healing therapy.

Chenyu Wang, Qihang Wu, Luyao Zhuang, Yiqi Chen, Qiu Zhang, Yinuo Wu, Mingyang Jin, Jiansen Miao, Xiangyang Wang, Jiake Xu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Apple-Derived Vesicles Orchestrate Bone Regeneration:International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chenyu WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qihang WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Luyao ZhuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yiqi ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qiu ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yinuo WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mingyang JinMedical School, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiansen MiaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangyang WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. Electronic address: xiangyangwang@126.com.
Jiake XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, and Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China; School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: jiake.xu@siat.ac.cn.
Haiming JinDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. Electronic address: kkjinhaiming@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunometabolism, the regulation of immune cell function through metabolic pathways, has emerged as a key focus in regenerative medicine. Traditional bone healing therapies primarily target the osteoblast-osteoclast regulatory axis, overlooking the metabolic reprogramming of immune cells (e.g., macrophages) and limiting regenerative efficiency. Macrophages orchestrate bone healing through dynamic shifts between proinflammatory (M1-like) and reparative (M2-like) metabolic phenotypes. Recent studies have shown that their immunometabolic transitions govern the sequential phases of bone healing. Therefore, targeting macrophage immunometabolism may offer a novel therapeutic paradigm for bone regeneration. AIM OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent advances in understanding how macrophage metabolism regulates bone healing, emphasizing the critical role of immunometabolism in resolving inflammation and regenerating tissue throughout the repair process. By integrating insights from the fields of cellular metabolism, microenvironmental signals, and biomaterial science, this review aims to offer an integrative perspective on how targeting macrophage metabolic control could serve as a therapeutic strategy to enhance bone regeneration. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: This review addresses five core concepts. First, it delineates the spatiotemporal roles and phenotypic shifts of macrophages in the different phases of bone healing. Second, it explores how the reprogrammed metabolism of glucose, lipids, and amino acids underlies macrophage polarization and function. Third, it emphasizes how microenvironmental cues, including cytokines, metabolic intermediates, and microbiota-derived metabolites, modulate macrophage immunometabolism. Fourth, it summarizes emerging therapeutic strategies designed to regulate macrophage metabolism for bone regeneration, such as cell-based therapies, immunomodulatory hydrogels, and nanotechnologies. Finally, it identifies major challenges in this field. These include the temporal-spatial complexity of immunometabolism, the lack of human-relevant models, the emerging concepts of cross-system regulation, and the technological limitations in targeted regulation. Together, these insights provide a conceptual basis for future precision immunometabolic interventions in bone repair.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone RegenerationCellular MicroenvironmentMacrophagesAnimalsHumansBone healingBone regenerationImmunometabolismMacrophagesMetabolic reprogrammingMicroenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40744273
PMCPMC13001043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.