Evidence mapPaperPMID 40744933Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

Conditional universal differential equations capture population dynamics and interindividual variation in c-peptide production.

Max de Rooij, Natal A W van Riel, Shauna D O'Donovan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max de RooijDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. m.d.rooij@tue.nl.
Natal A W van RielDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Shauna D O'DonovanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 645.001.003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal differential equations (UDEs) are an emerging approach in biomedical systems biology, integrating physiology-driven mathematical models with machine learning for data-driven model discovery in areas where knowledge of the underlying physiology is limited. However, current approaches to training UDEs do not directly accommodate heterogeneity in the underlying data. As a data-driven approach, UDEs are also vulnerable to overfitting and consequently cannot sufficiently generalize to heterogeneous populations. We propose a conditional UDE (cUDE) where we assume that the structure and weights of the embedded neural network are common across individuals, and introduce a conditioning parameter that is allowed to vary between individuals. In this way, the cUDE architecture can accommodate inter-individual variation in data while learning a generalizable network representation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the cUDE as an extension of the UDE framework by training a cUDE model of c-peptide production. We show that our cUDE model can accurately describe postprandial c-peptide levels in individuals with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, we show that the conditional parameter captures relevant inter-individual variation. Subsequently, we use symbolic regression to derive a generalizable analytical expression for c-peptide production.

Indexed as

C-PeptideSystems BiologyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucose IntoleranceHumansMachine LearningModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerC-Peptide

Identifiers

PMID40744933
PMCPMC12313987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.