Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745293›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

"Anything can happen": experiences of people using opioids in a xylazine market.

Megan K Reed, Karla Martin González, Traci C Green, Tracy Esteves Camacho, Rose Laurano, Frida Clark-García, Catalyst Geraci, Ava Kane, Kristin L Rising

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megan K ReedCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 704, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Megan.K.Reed@jefferson.edu.
Karla Martin GonzálezCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 704, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Traci C GreenOpioid Policy Research Collaborative, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Tracy Esteves CamachoCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 704, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Rose LauranoCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 704, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Frida Clark-GarcíaProject SAFE, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Catalyst GeraciProject SAFE, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ava KaneProject SAFE, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kristin L RisingCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 704, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Funding

Community-informed approaches to the escalating presence of xylazine in opioidsR21DA058582 · NIDA · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI REED, MEGAN · 2023 to 2024
$447k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA058582-01NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA058582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundXylazine is associated with a number of negative health outcomes, such as severe wounds and withdrawal. As xylazine increasingly emerges in drug markets across the United States, there is an urgent need for a national response to reduce related harm. As such, healthcare systems, harm reduction organizations, and community members continue to work to identify and develop the best approaches for harm reduction interventions to address xylazine challenges. This study engaged people who use opioids (PWUO) in Philadelphia to explore current experiences with and responses to xylazine adulteration.

methodsFrom January to February 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with PWUO in the Kensington neighborhood of Philadelphia to explore their perceptions of and experiences with xylazine. We used a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) framework to include people with living experiences of xylazine use in the research process. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using content analysis to identify themes.

resultsAmong 40 participants, 50% were male, 55% White, 32% Latino, half completed high school and 40% were unhoused. Ages ranged from 25 to 57 years old. All reported using xylazine and fentanyl, and a majority (75%) had experienced an overdose in their lifetime. More than half (57.5%) reported injecting as a preferred method for mode of administration. Participants reported profound impacts from xylazine on themselves and the broader community of PWUO in Philadelphia. Conversations primarily centered on four domains of concern: wounds, withdrawal, safety concerns from unconscious sedation, and safety concerns from mobile sedation.

conclusionsXylazine had many negative impacts on PWUO, including severe wounds, withdrawal, and sedation, with sedation resulting in increased risk of robbery, physical or sexual assault, or accidents while sedated but mobile. Individual attempts to reduce these xylazine-related harms are insubstantial when placed against structural factors driving these risks. Increased investment in wound care supplies and streetside wound care nursing by trauma-informed clinicians who will not further stigmatize people in need of care may be beneficial. In addition, higher-level policy and programmatic changes, i.e., updating clinical procedures to treat withdrawal, access to housing, and lower barrier treatment facilities, are needed to reduce the harms associated with xylazine use most effectively.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersXylazineAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHarm ReductionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidXylazineCommunity-based participatory researchHarm reductionPeople who use opioidsXylazine

Identifiers

PMID40745293
PMCPMC12312578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.