ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Aortic valve stenosis and osteoporosis: insights from a mouse model.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The potential role of sex related differences of the microbiome and its impact on calcific aortic stenosis: a narrative review.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Considerations in the Use of Mouse Models of Vascular and Valvular Calcification.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Enigma of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: The Pivotal Role of Animal Models in Unraveling Pathogenesis and Advancing Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The role of microRNAs in calcific aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAortic valve stenosis (AVS) is the most common heart valve disease requiring intervention. Osteoporosis, affecting ~ 10% of those over 50, is linked to aortic valve calcification and increased AVS risk. However, its direct role in AVS development or progression remains unclear. Using a mouse model, we examined whether estrogen-deficiency-induced osteoporosis modifies early hemodynamic and histological remodeling of the aortic valve after mechanical injury, and whether zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment alters these processes.
methodsOsteoporosis was induced in mice via bilateral ovariectomy (OVX), with sham-operated controls. To prevent bone loss, ZA or vehicle were administered weekly via intraperitoneal injection. Two weeks post-OVX, AVS was induced by mechanically injuring the aortic valve under echocardiographic guidance, with control procedures (CTR) in separate groups. After model validation, C57BL/6J mice were assigned to six groups: WI Sham Vehicle, WI OVX Vehicle, WI OVX ZA, WI Sham ZA, CTR OVX Vehicle, and CTR OVX ZA. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-injury. Bone density was assessed via micro-CT and histology, with peak aortic velocity as the primary endpoint. Mice were euthanized at 8 weeks for tissue analysis.
resultsOVX induced a significant reduction in trabecular bone mineral density (TBM, 50.6%, p = 0.0025). Treatment with ZA effectively reversed bone resorption in OVX mice (p < 0.0001) and even enhanced trabecular structures compared to sham-operated animals (increase of TBM by 130%, p < 0.0001). Mechanical injury to the aortic valve successfully induced AVS, as evidenced by increased peak velocity (1294 vs. 2157 mm/s, p < 0.0001) and mean pressure gradient 2 weeks post-procedure (1.58 vs. 4.19 mmHg, p < 0.0001). However, neither OVX nor ZA treatment influenced the severity of AVS. Histological analyses confirmed aortic valve thickening following injury. Picrosirius red and CD68 staining revealed no differences in collagen content or immune cell infiltration of the aortic valve between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic animals.
conclusionOVX-induced osteoporosis did not affect AVS severity after mechanical injury in our study. This suggests osteoporosis may not directly influence AVS in the early, pre-calcific stage that was studied in this model. However, to overcome limitations of the study, further studies with longer durations or refined models are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.