ArticleBMC urology2025
Effects of different doses of ephedrine spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and adverse reactions in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of different doses of ephedrine spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and adverse reactions in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
methodsSixty patients who underwent TURP in our hospital from October 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively selected as the research subjects. According to the different doses of ephedrine needed during the operation, the patients were divided into observation group (10 mg ephedrine, n = 30) and control group (5 mg ephedrine, n = 30). The anesthetic effect of the two groups was evaluated. The changes of hemodynamics and stress indicators of the two groups were detected and the incidence of adverse reactions was analyzed.
resultsCompared with the control group, the onset time of motor block and sensory block in the observation group was significantly shorter (P < 0.05), but the duration of motor block and sensory block was significantly longer (P < 0.05). The heart rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group 10 min of administration and at the beginning of resection (P < 0.05). The diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure in the observation group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of cortisol (COR) and epinephrine (EPI) in the observation group were lower than the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 53.33% (16/30), which was higher than 20.00% (6/30) in the observation group (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe application of 10 mg ephedrine in TURP can help stabilize the hemodynamics of patients, reduce the stress response of the body, and decrease the incidence of hypotension and other adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.