Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2025
Randomised controlled trial of clozapine in resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.
Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-Drug Interactions and Individualized Clozapine Therapy in Patients with Depression: Insights from Real-World Data.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Investigating of the Experience of Subjective Well-Being of Clozapine Use in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Mixed Method Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClozapine (CLZ) stands out for its unique receptor profile, making it more effective than other antipsychotics, especially in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). There is growing evidence supporting its use in schizoaffective disorder (SZD), although diagnostic challenges and drug characteristics have complicated the implementation of specific clinical trials.
aimCompare efficacy and tolerability of CLZ in real-world patients with TRS and SZD.
methodsProspective, pragmatic, three-month, evaluator-blinded clinical trial with two randomised controlled arms (TRS groups) and a third fixed arm (SZD group). The clinical response was assessed by monthly visits during which the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Udvalg für Kliniske Undersogelser were administered. One hundred twenty-seven participants (74.8% men, 25.2% women; 84 TRS, 42 SZD; mean age of 38.53) completed the follow-up.
resultsPatients treated with CLZ showed a greater reduction in all the PANSS subscales, MADRS and CDSS. In cases of SZD, there was a significant decrease in positive (
conclusionsCLZ was effective in reducing psychotic and affective symptoms in patients with dual psychosis, with better outcomes in SZD compared with TRS.EudraCT protocol trial:2021-001278-44 (Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of clozapine in resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.