ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2025
Comprehensive review of mouse models for studying cancer-related fatigue: Methods, findings and future directions (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with cancer, significantly impacting their quality of life. Currently, the precise mechanisms underlying the onset of this fatigue remain poorly understood, and there is a notable lack of effective pharmacological treatments to alleviate it. Therefore, establishing a reliable and stable mouse model of CRF is essential for advancing research in this important area. The present study systematically reviewed various methods for inducing CRF in mice, including tumor-bearing models, chemotherapy and localized irradiation, either used alone or in combination. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these models were analyzed, providing researchers with valuable insights and references for selecting the most appropriate mouse model of CRF for their specific studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.