ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Differentiation of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma from other intrahepatic malignant lesions by a noninvasive predictive model based on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive predictive model, which was a reliable nomogram to accurately differentiate AFPN-HCC from other intrahepatic malignant lesions. Methods: This study enrolled 165 patients with malignant focal liver lesions, including AFPN-HCC (n=85) and other intrahepatic malignant lesions (n=80). Data were analyzed to screen for risk factors phase by using LASSO regression as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We constructed a model and developed a nomogram. Then using the area under the curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and 1,000 bootstraps to assess and internally validate the model performance. We calculated the optimal threshold, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of the prediction model. Results: LASSO and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that tumor number, necrosis in tumor, arterial phase enhancement pattern, arterial phase perfusion velocity, and Kupffer phase degree of washout were the significant predictors to differentiate AFPN-HCC from OM. The AUC was 0.886, and the AUC of internal validation was 0.865. The optimal critical value of the predicted value was 0.524, with a sensitivity of 82.35%, specificity of 85.00%, positive predicted value of 85.37%, negative predicted value of 81.93%, and an accuracy of 83.64%. The Conclusion: Our nomogram has excellent discrimination, calibration and clinical utility by combining SCEUS and clinical features, which may help clinicians improve the diagnostic performance for AFPN-HCC, contributing to individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.