ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Real-World Validity of Tissue-Agnostic Circulating Tumor DNA Response Monitoring in Lung Cancers Treated With Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, or Targeted Agents.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04180176 (A Multicenter, Low-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Prospective Clinicogenomic Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Low-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Prospective Clinicogenomic Program
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic utility of circulating tumor DNA assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating tumor DNA monitoring and blood tumor mutational burden in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with atezolizumab.Molecular oncology · 2025Trial
- Longitudinal methylated ctDNA increases predict immunotherapy progression across solid tumors.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Associations between early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and outcomes across randomized trials: Insights from the ctMoniTR project.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- The potential survival gain and cost-effectiveness of circulating tumor DNA-guided treatment switching in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A simulation modeling study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Brief Report: Multi-Institution Real-World Analysis Evaluating Safety, Efficacy, and ctDNA Dynamics After Tarlatamab in Patients With Previously Treated SCLC and LCNEC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- QVT score, a radiomic biomarker of vascular complexity, enables prognostication and monitoring of NSCLC immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- The Transformative Potential of Liquid Biopsies and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Modern Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Correlation Analysis Between Circulating Tumor DNA and Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Value of Dynamic Changes in Circulating Tumor DNA in Small Cell Lung Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring is emerging as a minimally invasive complement to tumor imaging. We evaluated the validity of tissue-agnostic ctDNA quantification across four treatment modalities in NSCLC and SCLC. Methods: Data from consenting patients were collected from electronic health records as part of the Prospective Clinico-Genomic study (NCT04180176). ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) was retrospectively calculated for plasma collected six to 15 weeks after therapy initiation. TF dynamics were compared among an exploratory cohort, NSCLC and SCLC validity cohorts, and by therapy class. Results: In on-treatment plasma, undetectable TF was associated with longer real-world progression-free survival and real-world overall survival in exploratory (21.8 versus 8.8 mo; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.50), validity NSCLC (23.5 versus 9.5 mo; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22-0.53), and validity SCLC (15.9 versus 8.3 mo; HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42) cohorts. Equal to or greater than 90% and equal to or greater than 50% TF reduction from baseline was also associated with significantly improved outcomes. ctDNA dynamics differed by treatment class: TF reported greater discriminatory power for selecting tumor responses to immunotherapy and targeted therapy (≥50% decrease in 91% of responders versus 24% of nonresponders) than chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy (86% versus 60%). TF dynamics correlated with outcomes, but models of real-world progression-free survival and real-world overall survival were improved when tumor response was included. Conclusions: Tissue-agnostic monitoring of molecular response on the basis of ctDNA TF dynamics has utility in the real-world setting across four different treatment regimens. These results suggest that ctDNA dynamics may be complementary to tumor imaging in both NSCLC and SCLC to better inform patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.