Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746669›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025

Real-World Validity of Tissue-Agnostic Circulating Tumor DNA Response Monitoring in Lung Cancers Treated With Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, or Targeted Agents.

Anne C Chiang, Russell W Madison, Zoe June Assaf, Alexander Fine, Yi Cao, Ole Gjoerup, Yanmei Huang, Dexter X Jin, Jason Hughes, Vladan Antic and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04180176 (A Multicenter, Low-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Prospective Clinicogenomic Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04180176 phase4completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Low-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Prospective Clinicogenomic Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2019 to 2023Enrolled945ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)ArmsBlood Draw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anne C ChiangYale School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, New Haven, Connecticut.
Russell W MadisonFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Zoe June AssafGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Alexander FineFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Yi CaoGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Ole GjoerupFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Yanmei HuangFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dexter X JinFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jason HughesFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Vladan AnticF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Amanda YoungFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David FabrizioFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David ShamesGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Sophia MaundGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Alexia ExarchosGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Shailendra LakhanpalAlabama Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Richard ZunigaNew York Cancer & Blood Specialists, New York, New York.
Lincoln W PasquinaFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Katja SchulzeGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring is emerging as a minimally invasive complement to tumor imaging. We evaluated the validity of tissue-agnostic ctDNA quantification across four treatment modalities in NSCLC and SCLC. Methods: Data from consenting patients were collected from electronic health records as part of the Prospective Clinico-Genomic study (NCT04180176). ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) was retrospectively calculated for plasma collected six to 15 weeks after therapy initiation. TF dynamics were compared among an exploratory cohort, NSCLC and SCLC validity cohorts, and by therapy class. Results: In on-treatment plasma, undetectable TF was associated with longer real-world progression-free survival and real-world overall survival in exploratory (21.8 versus 8.8 mo; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.50), validity NSCLC (23.5 versus 9.5 mo; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22-0.53), and validity SCLC (15.9 versus 8.3 mo; HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42) cohorts. Equal to or greater than 90% and equal to or greater than 50% TF reduction from baseline was also associated with significantly improved outcomes. ctDNA dynamics differed by treatment class: TF reported greater discriminatory power for selecting tumor responses to immunotherapy and targeted therapy (≥50% decrease in 91% of responders versus 24% of nonresponders) than chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy (86% versus 60%). TF dynamics correlated with outcomes, but models of real-world progression-free survival and real-world overall survival were improved when tumor response was included. Conclusions: Tissue-agnostic monitoring of molecular response on the basis of ctDNA TF dynamics has utility in the real-world setting across four different treatment regimens. These results suggest that ctDNA dynamics may be complementary to tumor imaging in both NSCLC and SCLC to better inform patient care.

Indexed as

ctDNAImmunotherapyLung cancerMonitoringTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40746669
PMCPMC12311516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.