Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747264›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Drug substitutes - Insights on benefits, risks, detection methods, and management strategies: a systematic review.

Song Bai, Miao Li, Shouying Tang, Suran Wan, Rong Wu, Lijun Chen, Fang Wang, Shan Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Song BaiResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Miao LiResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Shouying TangResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Suran WanResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Rong WuResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Lijun ChenResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Fang WangResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.
Shan LiuResearch Center for Green Chemistry and Ecological Environment Technology, Guizhou Industry Polytechnic College, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abuse of new psychoactive substances and narcotic drugs as drug substitutes poses a serious threat to public health and safety. This study outlines the effective use and negative abuse of drug substitutes and outlines associated criminal behaviors to help readers understand the potential risks of such substances. By summarizing the technical bottlenecks in the analysis and detection of criminal cases, this study highlights their impact on case discrimination, which in turn can limit or even render policy implementation ineffective. Finally, based on database analysis and the current regulatory system, flexible control strategies were proposed to address the constantly emerging "new" substances, providing a reference for relevant control guidelines to be formulated.

Indexed as

analysis of technical bottlenecksbenefitsdrug substitutesmanagement strategiesrisks

Identifiers

PMID40747264
PMCPMC12310920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.