Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747438›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Structuring a textile knitting dataset for machine learning and data mining applications.

Toufique Ahmed, Abu Saleh Muhammad Junayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toufique AhmedDept. of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Daffodil international University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh.
Abu Saleh Muhammad JunayedKnitting Section, Fakhruddin Textile Mills Limited, Gazipur, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knitting is a vital sector of the fabric manufacturing industry. Concurrently, machine learning is emerging as a highly regarded technique for predicting patterns and classifying various parameters derived from datasets. This study aims to establish a comprehensive database of knitted fabrics that encompasses a variety of parameters related to yarn types, machinery, and fabric characteristics. The raw data was collected from a knitting factory, after which the dataset was processed with various pre-processing techniques using domain knowledge and the Python programming. These techniques included data cleaning, normalization, and feature engineering, all of which were crucial in ensuring the quality and usability of the dataset. Drawing on expertise in knitting science, several new parameters were formulated, and specific complex parameters were subsequently deconstructed into two or three distinct components. The finalized dataset has 12569 rows and 38 columns. This article also discusses potential applications of the dataset, such as identifying a polynomial relationship between grams per square meter (GSM) and yarn count for single jersey fabrics, having an R² score of 0.77. Furthermore, a quadratic relationship between the tightness factor and stitch length was observed, with an R² score of 0.78. Among various machine learning models to predict GSM, Random Forest and XGBoost consistently outperformed across all metrics (R² score, Mean Absolute Error, and Mean Square Error).

Indexed as

Data processingGSMPythonRandom forestTightness factor

Identifiers

PMID40747438
PMCPMC12312116

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.