ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025
Emerging applications of feature selection in osteoporosis research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision support.
Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of metabolomics and machine learning algorithm for discovery of early diagnostic biomarkers of osteoporosis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP), a systemic skeletal disease characterized by compromised bone strength and elevated fracture susceptibility, represents a growing global health challenge that necessitates early detection and accurate risk stratification. With the exponential growth of multidimensional biomedical data in OP research, feature selection has become an indispensable machine learning paradigm that improves model generalizability. At the same time, it preserves clinical interpretability and enhances predictive accuracy. This perspective article systematically reviews the transformative role of feature selection methodologies across 3 critical domains of OP investigation: (1) multi-omics biomarker identification, (2) diagnostic pattern recognition, and (3) fracture risk prognostication. In biomarker discovery, advanced feature selection algorithms systematically refine high-dimensional multi-omics datasets (genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) to isolate key molecular signatures correlated with BMD trajectories and microarchitectural deterioration. For clinical diagnostics, these techniques enable efficient extraction of discriminative pattern from multimodal imaging data, including DXA, QCT, and emerging dental radiographic biomarkers. In prognostic modeling, strategic variable selection optimizes prognostic accuracy by integrating demographic, biochemical, and biomechanical predictors while mitigating overfitting in heterogeneous patient cohorts. Current challenges include heterogeneity in dataset quality and dimensionality, translational gaps between algorithmic outputs and clinical decision parameters, and limited reproducibility across diverse populations. Future directions should prioritize the development of adaptive feature selection frameworks capable of dynamic multi-omics data integration, coupled with hybrid intelligence systems that synergize machine-derived biomarkers with clinician expertise. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated interdisciplinary efforts to establish standardized validation protocols and create clinician-friendly decision support interfaces, ultimately bridging the gap between computational OP research and personalized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.