ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2025
A high-resolution data set of fatty acid-binding protein structures. III. Unexpectedly high occurrence of wrong ligands.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoiding pitfalls when modelling ligands in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Predicting Ligand Binding Modes by Scaffold-Guided Structure Refinement.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Developments and challenges in hit progression within fragment-based drug discovery.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FABP4 has been implicated as a therapeutic target for treating diabetes and atherosclerosis. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) based on initial hits from high-throughput and fragment screens yielded 216 ligand-bound structures of human FABP3, FABP4 and FABP5 isoforms, many of which were at resolutions of better than 1.2 Å. An estimated 15% of the ligands had a different chemical composition to that expected from the starting materials or the final synthesis product, highlighting a potential problem inherent to all SBDD campaigns conducted at lower resolution. Apart from possible human error during compound registration, side reactions such as additions, eliminations, isomerizations, cyclizations and dimerizations were found that led to compounds capable of binding to FABP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.