Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748323›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A technical review of multi-omics data integration methods: from classical statistical to deep generative approaches.

Ana R Baião, Zhaoxiang Cai, Rebecca C Poulos, Phillip J Robinson, Roger R Reddel, Qing Zhong, Susana Vinga, Emanuel Gonçalves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana R BaiãoINESC-ID, Rua Alves Redol 9, 1000-029 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-8080
Zhaoxiang CaiProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3809-0817
Rebecca C PoulosProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8419-7028
Phillip J RobinsonProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Roger R ReddelProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Qing ZhongProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-301X
Susana VingaINESC-ID, Rua Alves Redol 9, 1000-029 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-5487
Emanuel GonçalvesINESC-ID, Rua Alves Redol 9, 1000-029 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-5205

Funding

Cancer Institute New South Wales 2017/TPG001Cancer Institute New South Wales 2021/CBG0002Cancer Institute New South Wales REG171150Cancer Institute NSW 2021/CBG0002Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 15030Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2024.07252.IACDCFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia RE-C05-i08.M04Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UI/BD/154599/2022Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50021/2020National Breast Cancer Foundation IIRS-18-164National Health and Medical Research Council 826121National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1170739NHMRC GNT2000855U.S. National Cancer Institute's International Cancer Proteogenome Consortium (ICPC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing and other assay technologies has resulted in the generation of large and complex multi-omics datasets, offering unprecedented opportunities for advancing precision medicine. However, multi-omics data integration remains challenging due to the high-dimensionality, heterogeneity, and frequency of missing values across data types. Computational methods leveraging statistical and machine learning approaches have been developed to address these issues and uncover complex biological patterns, improving our understanding of disease mechanisms. Here, we comprehensively review state-of-the-art multi-omics integration methods with a focus on deep generative models, particularly variational autoencoders (VAEs) that have been widely used for data imputation, augmentation, and batch effect correction. We explore the technical aspects of VAE loss functions and regularisation techniques, including adversarial training, disentanglement, and contrastive learning. Moreover, we highlight recent advancements in foundation models and multimodal data integration, outlining future directions in precision medicine research.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningMultiomicsPrecision Medicinedeep generative modelsmachine learningmulti-omics integrationprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40748323
PMCPMC12315550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.