Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748459›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Natural language processing and LLMs in liver imaging: a practical review of clinical applications.

Pilar López-Úbeda, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Antonio Luna

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pilar López-ÚbedaHT Médica, Jaén, Spain. p.lopez@htmedica.com.
Teodoro Martín-NoguerolHT Médica, Jaén, Spain.
Antonio LunaHT Médica, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de ciencia e innovación PTQ2021-012120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver diseases pose a significant global health challenge due to their silent progression and high mortality. Proper interpretation of radiology reports is essential for the evaluation and management of these conditions but is limited by variability in reporting styles and the complexity of unstructured medical language. In this context, Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools to extract relevant clinical information from unstructured liver radiology reports. This work reviews, from a practical point of view, the current state of NLP and LLM applications for liver disease classification, clinical feature extraction, diagnostic support, and staging from reports. It also discusses existing limitations, such as the need for high-quality annotated data, lack of explainability, and challenges in clinical integration. With responsible and validated implementation, these technologies have the potential to transform liver clinical management by enabling faster and more accurate diagnoses and optimizing radiology workflows, ultimately improving patient care in liver diseases.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge language modelLiver imagingNatural language processingPractical review

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.