ReviewJournal of Crohn's & colitis2025
Practical considerations for the use of IL-23p19 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: how to choose between them and why it matters?
Review in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacokinetics of IL-23p19 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Pooled it
- Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Use of Small Molecules and IL-23 p19 Inhibitors in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Guideline
- Inflammatory bowel disease treatment: Mechanisms to clinical translation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Selective IL-23 inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and perspectives for multimodal personalized treatment: a narrative review.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Interleukin-23p19 Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Current Insights to Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- The role and targeting potential analysis of angiogenesis-related target THY1 in DSS-induced acute colitis in mice.PloS one · 2026Article
- Positioning Guselkumab in The Treatment Algorithm for Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Comparative safety profiles of risankizumab versus guselkumab: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Shared inflammatory architecture and therapeutic tensions between psoriasis and Crohn's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wide range of advanced therapies has become available in recent years for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Among these, monoclonal antibodies targeting the interleukin 23 p19 subunit (anti-IL23p19) have emerged as a promising therapeutic class. Pivotal Phase 3 trials have demonstrated their favorable clinical efficacy and safety in both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Three such agents, Risankizumab, Mirikizumab, and Guselkumab, have now been approved in CD and UC. For gastroenterologists, the ability to rationally select among these options to personalize treatment and maximize patient benefit is critical. Key factors to consider when selecting an anti-IL23p19 agent include patient preference regarding mode of administration, IBD phenotype, presence of coexisting extra-intestinal manifestations, concomitant immune-mediated diseases, and previous advanced-therapy exposure. Our review summarizes the current clinical evidence on anti-IL23p19 therapies and provides practical guidance on their use in IBD clinical management, including dosing strategies, choice of dose in CD and UC, and clinical positioning across patients. Finally, anti-IL23p19 inhibition may represent a future first-line therapy option for moderate-to-severe IBD, particularly in patients with concomitant IL-23 driven comorbidities such as psoriasis. Its use in combination with other advanced therapies in selected patients is being explored to enhance therapeutic efficacy and improve long-term outcomes. Further real-world studies are needed to assess its effectiveness and benefits in complex disease phenotypes, including perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.